社會(huì)類(lèi)雅思寫(xiě)作范文之工商業(yè)與城鄉(xiāng),，為幫助大家更好準(zhǔn)備雅思考試，現(xiàn)在陸續(xù)為大家提供雅思作文考試新真題和范文及其譯文,，希望對(duì)大家雅思考試有所幫助,，一起來(lái)看:社會(huì)類(lèi)雅思寫(xiě)作范文之工商業(yè)與城鄉(xiāng)。
【考題解析】
考題重現(xiàn):In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businessesto move out of large cities and into rural areas. To what extent do you agreeor disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from yourknowledge or experiences.
核心詞匯:industries and businesses to move out of city
文章結(jié)構(gòu):辯論型片面式話題,。
【9分范文】
Like a disease that troubles the patients, traffic and housing problems in almost every metropolis are what governments must address without any delay. But, how can we cope with these problems? One theory claims that big companies and factories should be moved to rural areas. Although it sounds plausible, the theory is not essentially flawless.
Admittedly, transferring big companies and factories into rural areas does reduce the pressure in the urban area to some extent. However, it is completely wrong to attribute city housing and traffic problems to big companies and factories. Why? The area that big factories and companies occupy usually accounts for less than 15% of the whole city-state. e Hence, big companies and factories contribute little to housing and traffic problems. Moreover, the number of the employees of big companies and factories is not large enough to give rise to traffic and housing problems.
In addition, to move big companies and factories cannot solve the housing and traffic problems completely. In fact, it harms rather than helps city economic development by shifting the problems from the city to the countryside. once the big companies and factories are moved to the suburbs, schools, banks, hospitals, raw material suppliers and the like will also stream into the countryside. When the system becomes flooded, a new city comes into being. Then, the old problems would reappear in the “new city”. In addition, it is these big companies and factories that trigger and lead the city's economic development. To remove them, products and services arc expensive. Hence, to move them to the countryside makes little sense.
In summary, I do not agree that big companies and factories should be moved to the solve the problem more effectively and efficiently, governments and scholars should considerit more insightfully and seriously. 【范文譯文】
如同困擾著病人的疾病一樣,，幾乎每個(gè)大城市的交通和住房問(wèn)題都是政府重待解決的難題。那到底該如何解決這些問(wèn)題呢,？有一種理論是,，將所有的大型工廠企業(yè)遷至農(nóng)村。盡管聽(tīng)起來(lái)有些道理,，但還是充滿了漏洞,。
不得不承認(rèn)，將大型工廠和企業(yè)從城市遷移到農(nóng)村確實(shí)可以在某種程度上緩和城市壓力,。然而,，將城市的交通和住房問(wèn)題與大型企業(yè)和工廠聯(lián)系在一起是極其錯(cuò)誤的。為什么,？因?yàn)檫@些工廠和企業(yè)在城市總面積中所占的比例不足15%,。因此，工廠和企業(yè)對(duì)于城市住房和交通的影響是微不足道的,。并且,。其員工人數(shù)也沒(méi)有大到能引起城市交通和住房問(wèn)題。
此外,，將大的工廠和企業(yè)從城市遷移到農(nóng)村無(wú)法徹底解決城市的住房和交通問(wèn)題,。事實(shí)上,，這種做法是在損害而并不是幫助當(dāng)?shù)亟?jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展。它只是把城市的問(wèn)題轉(zhuǎn)移到了農(nóng)村而已,。一旦這些工廠和企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移到農(nóng)村,，學(xué)校、銀行,、醫(yī)院,、原材料供應(yīng)者和其相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)都要涌入農(nóng)村。當(dāng)整個(gè)體系如洪水般涌入時(shí),，那么“新城市”就誕生了。另外,，也正是這些大的企業(yè)和工廠促進(jìn)和領(lǐng)導(dǎo)了城市的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,。將其移到農(nóng)村，整個(gè)商品和服務(wù)業(yè)的價(jià)格都會(huì)變得昂貴,。因此,，將其轉(zhuǎn)移到農(nóng)村沒(méi)有任何意義。
總而言之,，我個(gè)人并不同意將大的工廠企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移到農(nóng)村去這種觀點(diǎn),。想要更有效地解決此類(lèi)問(wèn)題。政府和學(xué)者應(yīng)該做更深入而又謹(jǐn)懊的考慮,。
【亮點(diǎn)句型】 like a disease that troubles the patients, sth. is what governments must addresswithout delay
就如同困擾著病人的疾病,，某事是政府亞待解決的難題
Like a disease that troubles the patients, traffic and housing problems in almost everymetropolis are what governments must address without any delay.
it is completely wrong to attribute A to B
將A和B聯(lián)系在一起是完全錯(cuò)誤的
However, it is completely wrong to attribute city housing and traffic problems to bigcompanies and factories.
sth. contributes little to sth.
某事對(duì)于某事幾乎沒(méi)有影響
Hence, big companies and factories contribute little to housing and traffic problems.
更多雅思考試資訊請(qǐng)進(jìn)入【朗閣雅思】/member/ 更多雅思考試培訓(xùn)請(qǐng)進(jìn)入【廣州朗閣雅思】
【考題解析】
考題重現(xiàn):In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businessesto move out of large cities and into rural areas. To what extent do you agreeor disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from yourknowledge or experiences.
核心詞匯:industries and businesses to move out of city
文章結(jié)構(gòu):辯論型片面式話題,。
【9分范文】
Like a disease that troubles the patients, traffic and housing problems in almost every metropolis are what governments must address without any delay. But, how can we cope with these problems? One theory claims that big companies and factories should be moved to rural areas. Although it sounds plausible, the theory is not essentially flawless.
Admittedly, transferring big companies and factories into rural areas does reduce the pressure in the urban area to some extent. However, it is completely wrong to attribute city housing and traffic problems to big companies and factories. Why? The area that big factories and companies occupy usually accounts for less than 15% of the whole city-state. e Hence, big companies and factories contribute little to housing and traffic problems. Moreover, the number of the employees of big companies and factories is not large enough to give rise to traffic and housing problems.
In addition, to move big companies and factories cannot solve the housing and traffic problems completely. In fact, it harms rather than helps city economic development by shifting the problems from the city to the countryside. once the big companies and factories are moved to the suburbs, schools, banks, hospitals, raw material suppliers and the like will also stream into the countryside. When the system becomes flooded, a new city comes into being. Then, the old problems would reappear in the “new city”. In addition, it is these big companies and factories that trigger and lead the city's economic development. To remove them, products and services arc expensive. Hence, to move them to the countryside makes little sense.
In summary, I do not agree that big companies and factories should be moved to the solve the problem more effectively and efficiently, governments and scholars should considerit more insightfully and seriously. 【范文譯文】
如同困擾著病人的疾病一樣,，幾乎每個(gè)大城市的交通和住房問(wèn)題都是政府重待解決的難題。那到底該如何解決這些問(wèn)題呢,？有一種理論是,，將所有的大型工廠企業(yè)遷至農(nóng)村。盡管聽(tīng)起來(lái)有些道理,，但還是充滿了漏洞,。
不得不承認(rèn)，將大型工廠和企業(yè)從城市遷移到農(nóng)村確實(shí)可以在某種程度上緩和城市壓力,。然而,，將城市的交通和住房問(wèn)題與大型企業(yè)和工廠聯(lián)系在一起是極其錯(cuò)誤的。為什么,？因?yàn)檫@些工廠和企業(yè)在城市總面積中所占的比例不足15%,。因此，工廠和企業(yè)對(duì)于城市住房和交通的影響是微不足道的,。并且,。其員工人數(shù)也沒(méi)有大到能引起城市交通和住房問(wèn)題。
此外,，將大的工廠和企業(yè)從城市遷移到農(nóng)村無(wú)法徹底解決城市的住房和交通問(wèn)題,。事實(shí)上,，這種做法是在損害而并不是幫助當(dāng)?shù)亟?jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展。它只是把城市的問(wèn)題轉(zhuǎn)移到了農(nóng)村而已,。一旦這些工廠和企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移到農(nóng)村,，學(xué)校、銀行,、醫(yī)院,、原材料供應(yīng)者和其相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)都要涌入農(nóng)村。當(dāng)整個(gè)體系如洪水般涌入時(shí),，那么“新城市”就誕生了。另外,，也正是這些大的企業(yè)和工廠促進(jìn)和領(lǐng)導(dǎo)了城市的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,。將其移到農(nóng)村，整個(gè)商品和服務(wù)業(yè)的價(jià)格都會(huì)變得昂貴,。因此,，將其轉(zhuǎn)移到農(nóng)村沒(méi)有任何意義。
總而言之,，我個(gè)人并不同意將大的工廠企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移到農(nóng)村去這種觀點(diǎn),。想要更有效地解決此類(lèi)問(wèn)題。政府和學(xué)者應(yīng)該做更深入而又謹(jǐn)懊的考慮,。
【亮點(diǎn)句型】 like a disease that troubles the patients, sth. is what governments must addresswithout delay
就如同困擾著病人的疾病,，某事是政府亞待解決的難題
Like a disease that troubles the patients, traffic and housing problems in almost everymetropolis are what governments must address without any delay.
it is completely wrong to attribute A to B
將A和B聯(lián)系在一起是完全錯(cuò)誤的
However, it is completely wrong to attribute city housing and traffic problems to bigcompanies and factories.
sth. contributes little to sth.
某事對(duì)于某事幾乎沒(méi)有影響
Hence, big companies and factories contribute little to housing and traffic problems.
更多雅思考試資訊請(qǐng)進(jìn)入【朗閣雅思】/member/ 更多雅思考試培訓(xùn)請(qǐng)進(jìn)入【廣州朗閣雅思】