在北京做審計(jì)報(bào)告的收費(fèi)標(biāo)準(zhǔn).I37撥號(hào)I68O苑佳俊48O6.

審計(jì)報(bào)告是注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師在完成審計(jì)工作后向委托人提交的最終產(chǎn)品.注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師只有在實(shí)施審計(jì)工作的基礎(chǔ)上才能報(bào)告.注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師通過對(duì)財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表發(fā)表意見,從而履行業(yè)務(wù)約定的責(zé)任.無保留意見的審計(jì)報(bào)告

無保留意見是指注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師對(duì)被審計(jì)單位的會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表,依照中國(guó)注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師獨(dú)立審計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的要求進(jìn)行審查后確認(rèn):被審計(jì)單位采用的會(huì)計(jì)處理方法遵循了會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則及有關(guān)規(guī)定.會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表反映的內(nèi)容符合被審計(jì)單位的實(shí)際情況.會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表內(nèi)容完整,表述清楚,無重要遺漏.報(bào)表項(xiàng)目的分類和編制方法符合規(guī)定要求,因而對(duì)被審計(jì)單位的會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表無保留地表示滿意.無保留意見意味著注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師認(rèn)為會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表的反映是合法,、公允和一貫的,能滿足非特定多數(shù)利害關(guān)系人的共同需要.

保留意見是指注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師對(duì)會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表的反映有所保留的審計(jì)意見.注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師經(jīng)過審計(jì)后,認(rèn)為被審計(jì)單位會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表的反映就其整體而言是恰當(dāng)?shù)?但還存在著下述情況之一時(shí),應(yīng)出具保留意見的審計(jì)報(bào)告:個(gè)別重要財(cái)務(wù)會(huì)計(jì)事項(xiàng)的處理或個(gè)別重要會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表項(xiàng)目的編制不符合《企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則》和國(guó)家-有關(guān)財(cái)務(wù)會(huì)計(jì)法規(guī)的規(guī)定,而且被審計(jì)單位拒絕進(jìn)行調(diào)整.因?qū)徲懛秶艿骄植?,無法按照獨(dú)立審計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的要求取得應(yīng)有的審計(jì)證據(jù):個(gè)別會(huì)計(jì)處理方法的選用不符合一貫性原則.

否定意見是指與無保留意見相反.認(rèn)為會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表不能合法,、公允、一貫地反映被審計(jì)單位財(cái)務(wù)狀況、經(jīng)營(yíng)成果和現(xiàn)金流動(dòng)情況.注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師經(jīng)過審計(jì)后,認(rèn)為被審計(jì)單位的會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表存在下述情況時(shí),應(yīng)當(dāng)出具否定意見的審計(jì)報(bào)告:會(huì)計(jì)處理方法的選用嚴(yán)重違反《企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則》和國(guó)家-有關(guān)財(cái)務(wù)會(huì)計(jì)法規(guī)的規(guī)定,被審計(jì)單位拒絕進(jìn)行調(diào)整.會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表嚴(yán)重歪曲了被審計(jì)單位的財(cái)務(wù)狀況,經(jīng)營(yíng)成果和現(xiàn)金流動(dòng)情況,而且被審計(jì)單位拒絕進(jìn)行調(diào)整.

無法表示意見是指注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師說明其對(duì)被審計(jì)單位會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表的合法性,、公允性和一貫性無法發(fā)表意見.注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師在審計(jì)過程中,由于審計(jì)范圍受到委托人、被審計(jì)單位或客觀環(huán)境的嚴(yán)重-,不能獲取必要的審計(jì)證據(jù),以致無法對(duì)會(huì)計(jì)報(bào)表整體反映發(fā)表審計(jì)意見時(shí),應(yīng)當(dāng)出具無法表示意見的審計(jì)報(bào)告.